La disciplina dei sistemi d’arma autonomi nel diritto internazionale umanitario. Stato dell’arte e prospettive di regolamentazione
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32091/RIID0237Keywords:
Autonomous Weapons Systems, International Humanitarian Law, Article 36 of the First Additional Protocol to the Geneva Conventions, Principles of Distinction, Proportionality and Precaution, Artificial IntelligenceAbstract
The Legality of Autonomous Weapons Systems under International Humanitarian Law: What the Law Says and How It Could Be Improved
This article pursues a twofold objective: on the one hand, it offers an overview of the legal framework currently applicable to autonomous weapons systems (AWS), with a focus on the rules of international humanitarian law (IHL); on the other hand, it outlines possible trajectories for the development of future international regulation on AWS. After clarifying the notion of AWS, the article examines the IHL norms applicable to their use, with particular emphasis on legal reviews under Article 36 of Additional Protocol I. It highlights how the decision-making autonomy of such systems requires not only an assessment of their intrinsic lawfulness but also of their capacity to comply with the principles of distinction and proportionality. The obligations stemming from the principle of precaution are also addressed, especially regarding the design of AWS and the human-machine interaction. The second part explores the main regulatory proposals currently on the table, zooming in on the ICRC’s two-tier approach and the most recent developments within the GGE and the UN General Assembly.
References
D. Amoroso (2020), Autonomous Weapons Systems and International Law. A Study on Human-Machine Interactions in Ethically and Legally Sensitive Domains, ESI/Nomos, 2020
D. Amoroso, G. Tamburrini (2021), Toward a Normative Model of Meaningful Human Control over Weapons Systems, in “Ethics & International Affairs”, vol. 35, 2021, n. 2
Article36 (2013), Killer Robots: UK Government Policy on Fully Autonomous Weapons, April 2013
P. Asaro (2019), What is an ‘Artificial Intelligence Arms Race’ Anyway?, in “I/S: A Journal of Law and Policy for the Information Society”, 2019
I. Bode, H. Huells (2022), Autonomous Weapons Systems and International Norms, McGill-Queen’s University Press, 2022
V. Boulanin, M. Verbruggen (2017), Mapping the Development of Autonomy in Weapon Systems, SIPRI, 2017
E. Cannizzaro (2014), Proportionality in the Law of Armed Conflict, in A. Clapham, P. Gaeta (eds.), “The Oxford Handbook of International Law in Armed Conflict”, Oxford University Press, 2014
C. Carpenter (2014), “Lost” Causes: Agenda Vetting in Global Issue Networks and the Shaping of Human Security, Cornell University Press, 2014
K. Chowdhury (2025), Adversarial Machine Learning: Attacking and Safeguarding Image Datasets, in “arXiv”, 31 January 2025
Comitato internazionale della Croce Rossa (2024), International Humanitarian Law and the Challenges of Contemporary Armed Conflicts. Building a Culture of Compliance for IHL to Protect Humanity in Today’s and Future Conflicts, 2024
Comitato internazionale della Croce Rossa (2021), Position on Autonomous Weapon Systems, 2021
Comitato internazionale della Croce Rossa (2019), Autonomy, artificial intelligence and robotics: Technical aspects of human control, 2019
D. Copeland (2025), A Functional Approach to the Legal Review of Autonomous Weapon Systems, Brill, 2025
B. de Vries (2023), Individual Criminal Responsibility for Autonomous Weapons Systems in International Criminal Law, Brill, 2023
M. Ekelhof, G. Persi Paoli (2020), Swarm Robotics. Technical and Operational Overview of the Next Generation of Autonomous Systems, UNIDIR, 2020
W.J. Fenrick (1982), The Rule of Proportionality and Protocol I on Conventional Warfare, in “Military Law Review”, vol. 98, 1982
J.-M. Henckaerts, L. Doswald-Beck (2005), Customary International Humanitarian Law, Cambridge University Press, 2005
I. Henderson, K. Reece (2018), Proportionality under International Humanitarian Law: The “Reasonable Military Commander” Standard and Reverberating Effects, in “Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law”, vol. 51, 2018, n. 3
I. Henderson, P. Keane, J. Liddy (2017), Remote and Autonomous Warfare Systems: Precautions in Attack and Individual Accountability, in J.D. Ohlin (ed.), “Research Handbook on Remote Warfare, Edward Elgar”, 2017
J. Holland (2004), Military Objective and Collateral Damage: Their Relationship and Dynamics, in “Yearbook of International Humanitarian Law”, vol. 7, 2004
Human Rights Watch (2025), A Hazard to Human Rights. Autonomous Weapons Systems and Digital Decision-Making, 28 April 2025
Human Rights Watch (2012), Losing Humanity. The Case against Killer Robots, 2012
N. Jevglevskaja (2018), Weapons Review Obligation under Customary International Law, in “International Law Studies”, vol. 94, 2018
D. Kennedy (2004), Dark Side of Virtue: Reassessing International Humanitarianism, Princeton University Press, 2004
J. Kwik (2024), Lawfully Using Autonomous Weapon Technologies, Springer, 2024
M. Liu, J. Wei, Y. Liu, J. Davis (2025), Human and AI Perceptual Differences in Image Classification Errors, in T. Walsh, J. Shah, Z. Kolter (eds.), “Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence”, vol. 39, 2025, n. 13
S. Losey (2024), US Air Force stages dogfights with AI-flown fighter jet, in “Defense News”, 19 April 2024
M. Mancini (2006), Air Operations against the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia (1999), in N. Ronzitti, G. Venturini (eds.), “The Law of Air Warfare: Contemporary Issues”, Eleven International Publishing, 2006
D. Mauri (2022), Autonomous Weapons Systems and the Protection of the Human Person. An International Law Analysis, Edward Elgar, 2022
T. McFarland (2020), Autonomous Weapon Systems and the Law of Armed Conflict. Compatibility with International Humanitarian Law, Cambridge University Press, 2020
G. Mecacci, D. Amoroso, L. Cavalcante Siebert et al. (eds.) (2024), Research Handbook on Meaningful Human Control of Artificial Intelligence Systems, Edward Elgar, 2024
S. Parkin (2015), Killer robots: The soldiers that never sleep, in “BBC news”, 16 July 2015
D. Saxon (2021), Fighting Machines: Autonomous Weapons and Human Dignity, University of Pennsylvania Press, 2021
P. Scharre (2018), Army of None. Autonomous Weapons and the Future of War, W.W. Norton & Company, 2018
P. Scharre (2016), Centaur Warfighting: The False Choice of Humans vs. Automation, in “Temple International & Comparative Law Journal”, vol. 30, 2016, n. 2
M.N. Schmitt, J.S. Thurnher (2013), “Out of the Loop”: Autonomous Weapon Systems and the Law of Armed Conflict, in “Harvard National Security Journal”, 2013
A. Seixas-Nunes (2022), The Legality and Accountability of Autonomous Weapon Systems. A Humanitarian Law Perspective, Cambridge University Press, 2022
N.E. Sharkey (2016), Staying the Loop: Human Supervisory Control of Weapons, in N. Bhuta, S. Beck, R. Geiβ, et al. (eds.), “Autonomous Weapons Systems: Law, Ethics, Policy”, Cambridge University Press, 2016
M.R. Taddeo, A. Blanchard (2022), A Comparative Analysis of the Definitions of Autonomous Weapons Systems, in “Science and Engineering Ethics”, vol. 28, 2022
J.S. Thurnher (2014), Examining Autonomous Weapon Systems from a Law of Armed Conflict Perspective, in H. Nasu, R. McLaughlin (eds.), “New Technologies and the Law of Armed Conflict”, T.M.C. Asser Press, 2014
L. Valdares Fernandes Barbosa (2025), Autonomous Weapons Systems and the Responsibility of States. Challenges and Possibilities, Routledge, 2025
L. Varella (2025), Editorial: Disarmament is Always the Smartest Choice, in “CCW Report”, 2025
M. Zajac (2023), AWS compliance with the ethical principle of proportionality: three possible solutions, in “Ethics and Information Technology”, vol. 25, 2023, n. 1
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Rivista italiana di informatica e diritto
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
rivistariidATigsg.cnr.it