LLMs as smart concordancers for legal translation practice
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32091/RIID0286Keywords:
GenAI in legal translation, LLMs in legal translation, Legilinguistics, Corpus linguistics, Legal translationAbstract
There are several literature-driven studies exploring how intelligent machines and humans can interact to streamline and improve legal translation processes. Nonetheless, no scholarly research has focused on the employment of GenAI/LLMs as concordancers in the legal translation workflow. This paper aims at filling this epistemic lacuna by considering Notebook LM. For this purpose, an extract of an Italian certificate of limited partnership (società in accomandita semplice) is translated into English by leveraging Notebook LM and querying it as a corpus concordancer. Hence, 45 certificates of partnerships drawn up in English are uploaded to the LLM system and used as reference documents for the translation task. Prompts are formulated with a view to extracting collocates, disambiguating words in context, verifying word usages, obtaining concordances, and clarifying relevant legilinguistic aspects. To complete the analysis, the US Uniform Partnership Act 1997 – Last Amended 2013 (“UPA”) is also consulted via a separate folder of Notebook LM. The findings indicate the importance of formulating prompts as clearly and completely as possible in order to retrieve translation-salient information. The results also show that LLMs can be seamlessly integrated into the translation workflow: prompts can feature simple language and are articulated in a user-friendly environment, thus enabling accessibility by non-ICT specialists; responses are, most of the times, straightforward and coherent, thereby facilitating the reading and interpretation of corpus data. However, the upload of targeted and field-relevant documents, as well as expert knowledge are necessary to draft ad hoc queries, eschew unrelated responses, and interpret results consistently.
References
J. Allen, C. Hogan (2000), Toward the development of a post editing module for raw machine translation output: A controlled language perspective, in “Proceedings of the 3rd International Controlled Language Applications Workshop (CLAW-00)” (Seattle, Washington, USA), 2000
A.R.M. Altakhaineh, G.A. Alghathian, M.M. Jarrah (2025), A Comparative Study of Accuracy in Human vs. AI Translation of Legal Documents into Arabic, in “International Journal of Language & Law”, vol. 14, 2025
L. Anthony (2026), AntConc (Version 4.4.2) [Computer Software], Waseda University, Tokyo, 2026, available at: https://www.laurenceanthony.net/software.html
L. Anthony (2025), Integrating AI technology into corpus-based language learning through ChatAI, in “Computer Assisted Language Learning”, 2025
A.M. Badah, C.N. Khalaf, F.J. Dwaikat, N. AlQbailat (2026), The usage of artificial intelligence in legal translation: Bridging the gap between law and language, in “Ampersand”, vol. 16, 2026, 100248
M. Bajčić, D. Golenko (2024), Applying large language models in legal translation: The state-of-the-art, in “International Journal of Language & Law”, vol. 13, 2024
V. Briva-Iglesias, J.L. Cavalheiro Camargo, G. Dogru (2026), Large Language Models “Ad referendum”: How good are they at machine translation in the legal domain?, in arXiv, 2402.07681, 2026
F. do Carmo, D. Shterionov, J. Moorkens, J. Wagner, M. Hossari, E. Paquin, D. Schmidtke, D. Groves, A. Way (2020), A review of the state-of-the-art in automatic post-editing, in “Machine Translation”, vol. 35, 2020
M. Escribe, R. Mitkov (2023), Applying Incremental Learning to Post-editing Systems: Towards Online Adaptation for Automatic Post-editing Models, in J. Pan, S. Laviosa (eds.), “Corpora and Translation Education: Advances and Challenges”, Springer Nature, 2023
P. Giampieri (2025), Assessing the quality of AI and MT in legal translation, in “Altre Modernità”, vol. 33, 2025
P. Giampieri, M. Harper (2022), Legal translation: From dictionary to corpus, Le Penseur, 2022
M.H. Girard, E. Lehoux-Jobin, M. Pomerleau (2026), The use of MT and AI for translation by legal professionals in Canada. A survey-based study, in “Digital Translation”, 2026
X. Li, G. Wang (2025), Application and Limitations of Large Language Models in the Translation of the Contract Book of the Civil Code, in “Law and Humanities”, vol. 1, 2025, n. 3
M. Negri, M. Turchi, N. Bertoldi, M. Federico (2018), Online neural automatic post-editing for neural machine translation, in “Proceedings of the 5th Italian Conference on Computational Linguistics (CLIC-IT 2018)” (Torino, Italy), 2018
M. Negri, M. Turchi, R. Chatterjee, N. Bertoldi (2018), eSCAPE: A large-scale synthetic corpus for automatic post-editing, in “Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2018)” (Miyazaki, Japan), 2018
X. Niu, M. Carpuat (2020), Controlling Neural Machine Translation Formality with Synthetic Supervision, in “Proceedings of the Thirty-Fourth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-20)”, 2020
R. Rossini Favretti, F. Tamburini, E. Martelli (2007), Words from Bononia Legal Corpus, in W. Teubert (ed.), “Text corpora and multilingual lexicography”, John Benjamins, 2007
D. Shterionov, F. do Carmo, J. Moorkens, M. Hossari, J. Wagner, E. Paquin, D. Schmidtke, D. Groves, A. Way (2020), A roadmap to neural automatic post-editing: An empirical approach, in “Machine Translation”, vol. 34, 2020, n. 2
Thomson Reuters (2026), 2026 State of the US Legal Market, in thomsonreuters.com, 2026
Thomson Reuters (2025), 2025 Generative AI in Professional Services Report, in thomsonreuters.com, 2025
Thomson Reuters (2023), ChatGPT and Generative AI within Law Firms, in thomsonreuters.com, 2023
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Rivista italiana di informatica e diritto

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.












