Connettere le frontiere, snellire la giustizia, conciliare gli interessi. L’evoluzione del pacchetto e-Evidence: da un esordio problematico a un orizzonte incerto
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32091/RIID0216Parole chiave:
e-Evidence, Cooperazione giudiziaria, Crimine informatico, Unione europeaAbstract
L’aumento delle attività illecite condotte attraverso le piattaforme online sottolinea il ruolo cruciale delle prove digitali nelle indagini giudiziarie. Tuttavia, le autorità giudiziarie e di polizia incontrano difficoltà significative nell’accesso a tali prove, soprattutto quando queste sono conservate su infrastrutture estere o detenute da fornitori di servizi al di fuori della giurisdizione in cui viene svolta l’indagine. I meccanismi di cooperazione giudiziaria disponibili, così come gli accordi informali tra autorità e provider, si sono infatti rivelati carenti nel garantire un accesso tempestivo ed efficace alle prove digitali. Il pacchetto di norme dell’Unione europea in materia di e-evidence rappresenta un’importante evoluzione volta a colmare tali lacune. Tuttavia, nonostante il suo carattere innovativo, questo solleva numerose questioni di natura operativa e giuridica. Questo articolo esamina le caratteristiche principali del pacchetto e-evidence, soffermandosi sugli elementi che ne supportano il funzionamento sul piano operativo. Dopo aver delineato l’architettura del sistema e ricostruito il complesso iter che ha portato alla sua finalizzazione, l’analisi si concentra sul potenziale dell’attuale quadro normativo nel perseguire gli obiettivi prefissati. Particolare attenzione è riservata agli aspetti pratici e alle possibili criticità che potrebbero emergere nella fase di attuazione, con il rischio di comprometterne l’efficacia.
Riferimenti bibliografici
R. Amato, D. Cavallini, N. Carboni (2018), Italian National Report, in T. Marguery (ed.) “Mutual Trust under Pressure, the Transferring of Sentenced Persons in the EU: Transfer of Judgments of Conviction in the European Union and the Respect for Individual’s Fundamental Rights”, Wolf Publications, 2018
R. Amato, M. Velicogna (2020), Encoding Cross-Border Judicial Cooperation in Criminal Matters: Current Practices and the Rise of the EU E-Justice Infrastructure, in C. Billet, A. Turmo (eds.), “Coopération opérationnelle en droit pénal de l’Union européenne”, Bruylant, 2018
L. Bachmaier (2023), Mutual Admissibility of Evidence and Electronic Evidence in the EU. A New Try for European Minimum Rules in Criminal Proceedings?, in “Eucrim: the European Criminal Law Associations’ forum”, 2023, n. 2
L. Bachmaier (2018), Mutual Recognition and Cross-Border Interception of Communications: The Way Ahead for the European Investigation Order, in C. Brière, A. Weyembergh (eds.), “The Needed Balances in EU Criminal Law: Past, Present and Future”, Hart Publishing, 2018
D. Ben Miloud, C. Nicolau (2023), e-Evidence Digital Exchange System (eEDES), in M.A. Biasiotti, F. Turchi, “European Investigation Order. Where the Law Meets the Technology”, Springer, 2023
C. Berthélémy (2023), e-Evidence compromise blows a hole in fundamental rights safeguards, in “European Digital Rights (EDRI)”, 2023
M.A. Biasiotti (2018), Present and Future of the Exchange of Electronic Evidence in Europe, in M.A. Biasiotti, J.P. Mifsud Bonnici, J. Cannataci, F. Turchi (eds.), “Handling and Exchanging Electronic Evidence Across Europe”, Springer, 2018
M.A. Biasiotti, F. Turchi (eds.) (2023), European Investigation Order. Where the Law Meets the Technology, Springer, 2023
S. Busillo (2023), Conservazione e produzione della prova digitale nella nuova disciplina europea: il potenziale disallineamento con i principi espressi dalla giurisprudenza di settore, in “Freedom, Security & Justice: European Legal Studies”, 2023, n. 3
C. Brière (2021), EU Criminal Procedural Law onto the Global Stage: The e-Evidence Proposals and Their Interaction with International Developments, in “European Papers”, vol. 6, 2021, n. 1
F. Casino, C. Pina, P. López-Aguilar et al. (2022), SoK: cross-border criminal investigations and digital evidence, in “Journal of Cybersecurity”, vol. 8, 2022, n. 1
T. Christakis (2023), From Mutual Trust to the Gordian Knot of Notifications: The EU E-Evidence Regulation and Directive, in V. Franssen, S. Tosza (eds.), “The Cambridge Handbook of Digital Evidence in Criminal Matters”, Cambridge University Press, 2023
T. Christakis (2019), E-evidence: the way forward (Summary of the Workshop held in Brussels on 25 September 2019), in “European Law Blog. News and Comments on EU Law”, 2019
Council of Europe (2023), T-CY Guidance Note #13, The scope of procedural powers and of international cooperation provisions of the Budapest Convention, 27-28 June 2023
Council of Europe (2022), Second Additional Protocol to the Cybercrime Convention on enhanced co-operation and disclosure of electronic evidence (CETS No. 224), 2022
C. Cuadrado Salinas (2023), La Directiva Europea y las Órdenes de Producción y Conservación de pruebas electrónicas en los procesos penales. ¿Nuevas perspectivas?, in “Ius et Scientia”, vol. 9, 2023, n. 2
European Commission (2023), Digital Services Act: Commission designates first set of Very Large Online Platforms and Search Engines, Brussels, 25 April 2023
European Judicial Network (2018), 51st EJN Plenary meeting – Conclusions on the application of mutual recognition instruments, Brussels, 5 December 2018 (OR. en), 14754/18
Europol – European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Cooperation (2024), 5th Annual SIRIUS EU Electronic Evidence Situation Report, The Hague, November 2023 (updated version 11 April 2024)
G. Forlani (2023), The E-evidence Package. The Happy Ending of a Long Negotiation Saga, in “Eucrim: the European Criminal Law Associations’ forum”, 2023, n. 2
V. Franssen (2024), Cross-border Gathering of Electronic Evidence in the EU: Toward More Direct Cooperation under the e-Evidence Regulation, in M. Bergström, V. Mitsilegas, T. Quintel (eds.), “Research Handbook on EU Criminal Law”, 2nd ed., Edward Elgar, 2024
V. Franssen (2018), The European Commission’s E-evidence Proposal: Toward an EU-wide Obligation for Service Providers to Cooperate with Law Enforcement?, in “European Law Blog. News and Comments on EU Law”, 2018
G. González Fuster, S. Vázquez Maymir (2020), Cross-border Access to E-Evidence: Framing the Evidence, Center for European Policy Studies (CEPS), 2020
A. Juszczak, E. Sason (2023), The Use of Electronic Evidence in the European Area of Freedom, Security, and Justice An Introduction to the New EU Package on E-evidence, in “Eucrim: the European Criminal Law Associations’ forum”, 2023, n. 2
K. Lenaerts (2017), La vie après l’avis: exploring the principle of mutual (yet not blind) trust, in “Common Market Law Review”, vol. 54, 2017, n. 3
T. Marguery (2016), Rebuttal of Mutual Trust and Mutual Recognition in Criminal Matters: Is ‘Exceptional’ Enough?, in “European Papers”, vol. 1, 2016, n. 3
V. Mitsilegas (2020), Trust, in “German Law Journal”, Special Issue 1: “20 Challenges in the EU in 2020”, vol. 21, 2020
V. Mitsilegas, (2019), The European Model of Judicial Cooperation in Criminal Matters: Towards Effectiveness based on Earned Trust, in “Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal”, vol. 5, 2019, n. 2
V. Mitsilegas, (2018), The privatisation of mutual trust in Europe’s area of criminal justice: The case of e-evidence, in “Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law”, vol. 25, 2018, n. 3
V. Mitsilegas, (2014), Transatlantic counterterrorism cooperation and European values: The elusive quest for coherence, in E. Fahey, D. Curtin (eds.), “A Transatlantic Community of Law: Legal Perspectives on the Relationship between the EU and US Legal Orders”, Cambridge University Press, 2014
A. Mosna (2024), Judicial Protection in EU Cross-Border Evidence-Gathering: the EIO as a Case Study, in “EuCLR European Criminal Law Review”, vol. 14, 2024, n. 2
E.A. Ontanu (2023), The digitalisation of European Union procedures: A new impetus following a time of prolonged crisis, in “Law, Technology and Humans”, vol. 5, 2023, n. 1
E.A. Ontanu (2022), Normalising the use of electronic evidence: Bringing technology use into a familiar normative path in civil procedure, in “Oñati Socio-Legal Series”, vol. 12, 2022, n. 3
K. Propp (2024), Navigating Toward an EU-U.S. Agreement on Electronic Evidence, in“Lawfare”, 1 December 2023
A. Sachoulidou (2024), Cross-border access to electronic evidence in criminal matters: The new EU legislation and the consolidation of a paradigm shift in the area of ‘judicial’ cooperation, in “New Journal of European Criminal Law”, vol. 15, 2024, n. 3
J. Sarkowicz (2022), Legal representative in the proceedings of gathering e-evidence under European Production Order: de lege lata remarks and de lege ferenda postulates, in “EuCLR European Criminal Law Review”, vol. 12, 2022, n. 1
T. Schauenburg, D. Zapf, N. Rossbrey, F. Málaga (2023), EU breaks down digital borders: New e-Evidence rules facilitate cross-border investigations, in “White & Case”, 2023
R. Sicurella (2018), Fostering a European criminal law culture: In trust we trust, in “New Journal of European Criminal Law”, vol. 9, 2018, n. 3
S. Signorato (2023), Cross-Border Gathering of E-Evidence: Different Legal Frameworks in European Union and Council of Europe, in “Journal of Eastern European Criminal Law”, 2023, n. 1
B. Sippel (2023), Guest Editorial, in “Eucrim: the European Criminal Law Associations’ forum”, 2023, n. 2
S. Stolton (2018), Council makes half-hearted agreement on e-Evidence, in “EURACTIV”, 2018
I. Szijártó (2023), The Interplay Between the European Investigation Order and the Principle of Mutual Recognition, in “European Papers”, vol. 8, 2023, n. 3
S. Tosza (2024), Mutual recognition by private actors in criminal justice? E-evidence regulation and service providers as the new guardians of fundamental rights, in “Common Market Law Review”, vol. 61, 2024, n. 1
S. Tosza (2023), The E-Evidence Package is Adopted: End of a Saga or Beginning of a New One?, in “European Data Protection Law Review”, vol. 9, 2023, n. 2
S. Tosza (2021), Internet service providers as law enforcers and adjudicators. A public role of private actors, in “Computer law & Security review”, vol. 43, 2021
M. Velicogna (2018), e-Justice in Europe: From National Experiences to EU Cross-Border Service Provision, in L. Alcaide Muñoz, M.P. Rodríguez Bolívar (eds.) “International e-Government Development. Policy, Implementation and Best Practices”w, Palgrave Macmillan, 2018
M. Velicogna (2014), Coming to Terms with Complexity Overload in Transborder e-Justice: The e-CODEX Platform, in F. Contini, G.F. Lanzara (eds.), “The Circulation of Agency in E-Justice”, Springer, 2014
M. Velicogna, E. Steigenga, S. Taal, A. Schmidt (2020), Connecting EU Jurisdictions: Exploring How to Open Justice Across Member States through ICT, in “Social Science Computer Review”, vol. 38, 2020, n. 3
T. Wahl (2023), E-evidence Regulation and Directive Published, in “Eucrim: the European Criminal Law Associations’ forum”, 2023, n. 2
Dowloads
Pubblicato
Fascicolo
Sezione
Licenza
Copyright (c) 2025 Rivista italiana di informatica e diritto
Questo volume è pubblicato con la licenza Creative Commons Attribuzione - Non commerciale - Condividi allo stesso modo 4.0 Internazionale.
rivistariidATigsg.cnr.it